SCI收录上海中医药大学论文的计量分析

Title:

Bibliometric Analysis of SCI-covered Papers Published by Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

文章编号:

2095-5707(2016)06-0013-06

作者:

孙舒雯; 许吉; 施毅^*

上海中医药大学科技信息中心，上海 201203

Author(s):

SUN Shu-wen;  XU Ji;  SHI Yi^*

Science and Information Center of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China

关键词:

上海中医药大学; 《科学引文索引》; 文献计量分析

Keywords:

Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;  Science Citation Index;  bibliometric analysis

分类号:

R2-03

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2016.06.004

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的 通过对2005－2014年上海中医药大学科研人员在《科学引文索引》（SCI）来源期刊发文情况的分析，深入了解我校科研方向、科研实力和科技影响力。方法 以SCI为数据源，从文献年代、类型、语种、基金资助、来源期刊等多个角度，对上海中医药大学发表的论文进行分析和评价。 结果 2005－2014年SCI共收录作者单位为上海中医药大学的论文2103篇，其中2012－2014年的发文量达1287篇，占论文总数的61.20%；研究论文为数量最多的论文类型；载文量最多的期刊为Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine（《循证补充替代医学》），共141篇；以第一作者发文，影响因子最高的期刊为Journal of Clinical Oncology（《临床肿瘤学杂志》，2010年影响因子为18.97）；发文最多的基金资助来源是中国国家自然科学基金。结论 论文的数量和质量都有显著提高，但所发表期刊影响因子普遍较低，研究内容多以中药学科为主，应加强对中医内科理论和针灸学方面的研究。

Abstract:

Objective To deeply understand the research directions, research strength and research influence by analyzing the publication situation of the scientific research personnel of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Science Citation Index (SCI) from 2005 to 2014. Methods SCI was set as data source, and the papers published by Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were analyzed and assessed from the aspects of literature time, types, languages, funding and source journals. Results A total of 2103 SCI papers were published by Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from 2005 to 2014, and 1287 papers were published from 2012 to 2014 which accounted for 61.20% of the total. Most papers belonged to the type of research papers. Most published journal was Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine; the highest impact factor of the Journal by the first author was the Journal of Clinical Oncology (IF:18.97 in 2010); the fund with the most papers was National Natural Science Foundation of China. Conclusion Both the quantity and quality of papers gradually improve over time. However, the impact factors of journals are generally low and the contents foucs on TCM subjects. At the same time, research on TCM intermal medicine theory and acupuncture and moxibustion should be strengthened.