ZHEN Si-yuan,LI Hai-yan*,LIU Yang.Analysis on International Traditional Knowledge Protection Mode and Enlightenment of TCM Traditional Knowledge Protection in China[J].Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science for Traditional Chinese Medicine,2018,42(4):1-5.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2018.04.001]
国际传统知识保护模式分析及对我国中医药传统知识保护的启示
- Title:
- Analysis on International Traditional Knowledge Protection Mode and Enlightenment of TCM Traditional Knowledge Protection in China
- 文章编号:
- 2095-5707(2018)04-0001-05
- Keywords:
- traditional knowledge protection; TCM traditional knowledge; evidence-based protection; legislation-based protection; comprehensive protection
- 分类号:
- R288
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 中医药传统知识的重要性日益凸显,但保护工作进展缓慢,出现多起“生物盗版”事件。为探索适合我国国情的保护模式,本文在分析国际组织保护行为的基础上,对比分析了美国、印度、韩国、菲律宾、泰国、秘鲁、巴西等国家的传统知识保护方案,总结出“举证”式保护、“立法”式保护及“全面”式保护3种模式。“举证”式保护主要做法包括建立数据库、成立基金会、实行登记制度等;“立法”式保护主要做法是颁布传统知识保护法律或者在现有法律中增加传统知识保护条文;“全面”式保护主要做法是在保护传统知识的过程中融合多种保护模式。我国中医药传统知识保护工作也可以采用这3种模式,通过设立法律、构建数据库等方式,加快中医药传统知识保护进程。
- Abstract:
- The importance of TCM traditional knowledge is becoming more and more obvious. However, the protection work is progressing slowly, and there are many “biopiracy” incidents. In order to explore suitable protection mode for China, based on the analysis on protection behaviors of international organizations, this article compared and analyzed traditional knowledge protection schemes of the United States, India, South Korea, Philippines, Thailand, Peru, Brazil and other countries, and concluded three modes, including “evidence-based protection”, “legislation-based protection” and “comprehensive protection”. “Evidence-based protection” includes setting up databases, establishing foundations, and implementing registration systems, etc.; “Legislation-based protection” includes issuing traditional knowledge protection laws or adding items about traditional knowledge protection in the existed legal provisions. “Comprehensive protection” includes integrating multiple protection modes in the process of protecting traditional knowledge. Therefore, TCM traditional knowledge protection in China can apply the three modes by setting up traditional knowledge protection laws and building databases, in order to speed up the process of TCM traditional knowledge protection.
参考文献/References:
[1] 国家中医药管理局中医药传统知识保护研究中心.中医药传统知识保护[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,2016:53-56.
[2] 方新荣,金浪.对传统中医药知识产权保护相关问题的思考[J].海峡药学,2017,29(4):258-260.
[3] 武建勇.生物遗传资源获取与惠益分享制度的国际经验[J].环境保护,2016,44(21):71-74.
[4] 杨光,徐靖,池秀莲,等.《名古屋遗传资源议定书》对我国中医药发展的影响[J].中国中药杂志,2018,44(2):396-400.
[5] 王婷婷.传统知识数字化建设的国内外动向——以数据库和数字图书馆为中心[J].黑龙江史志,2014(17):276-277.
[6] 贾世敬,柳长华,孙嘉,等.韩国传统知识门户(KTKP)分析与中医药对策[J].世界中医药,2017,12(4):925-928,932.
[7] 孙嘉,宋歌,张逸雯.菲律宾健康传统知识数字图书馆分析及对中医药传统知识保护的启示[J].国际中医中药杂志,2017,39(11):961-963.
[8] 张逸雯.基于国际传统知识保护技术实践的中医药传统知识保护策略研究[D].北京:中国中医科学院,2016.
[9] 王孝蓉.中医药及泰国传统医药在泰国的发展概况[J].中国民族医药杂志,2010(10):48-50.
[10] 邓伟生,陈玉文.借鉴国外经验以保护我国传统医药知识[J].中国药业,2008,17(2):4-5.
[11] 董作军,黄文龙.秘鲁土著人传统医药知识保护制度简介与借鉴[J].中国新药杂志,2008,17(5):437-440.
[12] 赵琪,曹阳.传统药物知识产权国际保护协定实践研究——以秘鲁为例[J].现代商贸工业,2011(2):214-215.
[13] 武建勇,王爱华,孟蕊,等.巴西生物遗传资源获取与惠益分享管理制度研究[J].植物遗传资源学报,2017,18(5):920-924.
[14] 张逸雯,宋歌.印度传统知识数字图书馆(TKDL)编制技术分析及对中医药传统知识保护的启示[J].世界中医药,2014,9(12):1669-1671.
[15] 武建勇,李一丁.印度生物遗传资源和相关传统知识获取制度发展动态研究[J].植物遗传资源学报,2017,18(3):503-508.
相似文献/References:
[1]迟芬芳,罗卫芳*,李哲.论中医药知识产权保护的法律机制[J].中国中医药图书情报杂志,2014,38(6):50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2014.06.013]
Chi Fenfang,Luo Weifang*,Li Zhe.Legal Mechanism of Intellectual Property Right Protection of Traditional Chinese Medicine[J].Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science for Traditional Chinese Medicine,2014,38(4):50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2014.06.013]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2018-04-10
更新日期/Last Update:
2018-07-18