LIANG Jia,ZHAO Jia-you,WANG Le,et al.Analysis on Quality and Doctoral Dissertations of TCM and Exploration of Pre-control Management[J].Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science for Traditional Chinese Medicine,2019,43(6):62-65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2019.06.015]
中医药博士学位论文质量分析及其前控管理探索
- Title:
- Analysis on Quality and Doctoral Dissertations of TCM and Exploration of Pre-control Management
- 文章编号:
- 2095-5707(2019)06-0062-04
- Keywords:
- doctoral; dissertations; TCM; influencing factors; pre-control management; quality
- 分类号:
- G252.62;G643.8
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 对中国中医科学院研究生院2013届和2014届的67篇博士学位论文进行盲审,每篇学位论文由3位相关领域专家评审,共回收评阅意见书201份。利用频数统计法对数据进行统计,采用SPSS 18.0软件进行分析,探究影响中医药博士学位论文质量的因素,探索提出质量前控管理措施,以期完善中医药博士学位论文形成过程中的质量保障建设。结果显示,我院中医药博士学位论文质量整体良好,总体评审成绩主要分布在良好层面,占54.7%。各分项评审分数也以良好层面居多,均超过半数;其次是优秀层面,占比在30.0%左右。共有4篇博士学位论文为总体评价不合格,占6.0%,创新性及论文价值项4篇均出现不合格,选题与综述、科研能力与基础知识、论文规范性方面不合格各2篇。建议从研究生培养过程管理中完善学位论文质量的前控管理措施,进一步提升学位论文质量。
- Abstract:
- 67 doctoral dissertations from China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences in 2013 and 2014 were submitted for blind review and evaluation. Each dissertation was submitted to 3 experts in related fields. 201 opinions were collected and analyzed. The data were statistically analyzed by frequency statistics method and SPSS 18.0 software to explore the factors affecting the quality of doctoral dissertations of TCM and the pre-control management measures for the quality of doctoral dissertations of TCM, in order to improve the quality assurance construction in the formation of doctoral dissertations of TCM. The results showed that the quality of doctoral dissertations of TCM in our academy was generally good, and the overall evaluation results were mainly distributed at a good level, accounting for 54.7%; the distribution of each sub-item was mostly in good level, which was more than half; the second was excellent level, accounting for about 30.0%. A total of 4 doctoral dissertations were identified as unqualified doctoral dissertations in the overall evaluation, accounting for 6.0%; 4 were unqualified in terms of innovation and paper value; 2 were unqualified in terms of scientific research ability and basic knowledge, topics and reviews and paper norms. It is suggested to improve the pre-control management measures of the quality of dissertations from the management of postgraduate training process to further improve the quality level of dissertations.
参考文献/References:
[1] 王岚,陈帝昂,谢春光,等.研究生学位论文质量控制体系构建[J].中国中医药图书情报杂志,2019(3):70-74.
[2] 王则温,赵张耀.关于博士学位论文评审有关问题的探讨[J].学位与研究生教育,2009(3):38-42.
[3] 国务院学位委员会 教育部.国务院学务委员会 教育部关于印发《博士硕士学位论文抽检办法》的通知:学位[2014]5号[A/OL].(2014-03-18)[2019-06-10].http://www.cdgdc.edu.cn/webrms/wwwroot/zgxwyyjsj yxxw/xwyyjsjyxx/zxkb/hyxx/bgs/278526.shtml.
[4] 中华人民共和国教育部.教育部办公厅关于进一步规范和加强研究生培养管理的通知:教研厅〔2019〕1号[A/OL].(2019-03-04)[2019-06-10].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_826/201904/t20190412_377698.html.
[5] 李艳,马陆亭,赵世奎.博士学位论文质量及其影响因素研究[J].学位与研究生教育,2015(2):105-109.
[6] 高原,王哲,于丹,等.形成性评价在中医院校七年制病理学教学中的应用[J].现代医药卫生,2014,30(21):3328-3329.
[7] 李婷,刘燕,高莉晶,等.形成性评价在生理学教学中的应用初探[J].中国高等医学教育,2017(2):77-78.
[8] 龚桢梽,林梦泉,郑晓梅.影响全国优秀博士学位论文质量的作者、导师因素分析[J].江苏高教,2010(5):150-151.
相似文献/References:
[1]王岚,陈帝昂,谢春光,等.研究生学位论文质量控制体系构建[J].中国中医药图书情报杂志,2019,43(3):70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2019.03.018]
WANG Lan,CHEN Di-ang,XIE Chun-guang,et al.Construction of a Quality Control System for Postgraduate Thesis[J].Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science for Traditional Chinese Medicine,2019,43(6):70.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2019.03.018]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-06-12
更新日期/Last Update:
2019-11-28