国际高影响因子期刊收录中草药论文分析

Title:

Analysis on TCM Articles Published in International Journals with High Impact Factor

文章编号:

2095-5707(2017)04-0019-09

作者:

刘菊红

广州中医药大学图书馆，广东 广州 510405

Author(s):

LIU Ju-hong

Library of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong 510405, China

关键词:

中草药; SCI; PubMed; Citespace; 可视化; 文献计量法

Keywords:

Traditional Chinese Medicine;  SCI;  PubMed;  Citespace;  visualization;  bibliometrics

分类号:

R-058；G250.252

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2017.04.006

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的 对近20年在影响因子（IF）≥10的期刊上发表的中草药论文进行计量分析，了解世界主流医学杂志发表的中草药论文的特征。方法 以SCIE、PubMed平台为数据来源，采用Excel 2010及Citespace 4.2.R1（64-bit）分析软件，从作者所在国家、发文量、期刊、内容、被引情况、国际合作等方面进行计量分析。结果 检索到相关论文130篇，包括研究性论文96篇，综述34篇。美国、中国、西欧、日本是发表中草药论文最多的国家/地区；我国自2010年以来发文量逐渐稳定，从2013年开始超越美国成为发文量最多的国家。按照药物类型统计，研究中药提取物、中药复方、单味中药的论文分别为52、38、13篇，从研究角度统计，研究中草药治疗效果、化学/药理学、副作用的论文分别55、30、23篇。东亚、东南亚中医药传统强国中国、日本、新加坡、韩国的论文影响力相对偏低。中药复方论文的影响力低于中药提取物研究论文。中草药疗效观察论文影响力偏低。美国、中国处于国际合作网络的中心位置，中国机构在国际合作中发挥了重要的枢纽作用。结论 我国中草药科研的规模和水平都位于世界前列，但科研影响力有待进一步提升。应加强中医药科研与现代科学技术的融合，以现代科技推动中医药向更高、更深层次发展。

Abstract:

Objective To understand the attributes of TCM articles published in world main medical journals by conducting statistical analysis on TCM articles published in journals with impact factors (IF) ≥10 in recent 20 years. Methods SCIE and PubMed were set as data resources. Excel 2007 and Citespace 4.2.R1 (64-bit) were used to statistically analyze the aspects of the countries authors coming from, amounts of articles, journals, contents, citations, and international collaborations. Results 130 articles were retrieved, including 96 research articles and 34 reviews. America, China, Western Europe, and Japan published most of the articles. The amounts of articles from China have been steadily increased in recent years. From 2013, China has overtaken America becoming the country that published the most papers. According to medicine types, the amount of articles about TCM extracts, TCM compounds and single TCM were 52, 38, and 13 respectively. According to research perspective, the amounts of articles about research on TCM efficacy, chemical/pharmacology and the side effects were 55, 30, and 23 respectively. The scientific impact of articles from China, Japan, Singapore, and Korea was relatively lower than other countries/areas. The scientific impact of articles of TCM compounds was lower than TCM extracts. America and China were in the central position of international collaboration network.Chinese institutions played pivotal role in international collaboration. Conclusion China’s TCM research scale and level are located in the forefront of the world, but the scientific research impact is waited to be further improved. The integration of TCM research and modern science and technology should be strengthened. Modern technology should promote TCM to a higher and deeper level of development.