DOU Xue-jun,GAO Qiao-lin*,LUAN Shi-jie,et al.Analysis on the Academic Misconduct in the Papers Submitted by Some Colleges and Universities in Shandong Province and Understanding of Academic Misconduct Detection System[J].Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science for Traditional Chinese Medicine,2017,41(6):18-22.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2017.06.004]
山东省部分高校论文学术不端检测分析及学术不端检测系统使用体会
- Title:
- Analysis on the Academic Misconduct in the Papers Submitted by Some Colleges and Universities in Shandong Province and Understanding of Academic Misconduct Detection System
- 文章编号:
- 2095-5707(2017)06-0018-05
- Keywords:
- papers; academic misconduct; detection system; college and university
- 分类号:
- G644
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 目的 探讨山东省内部分高校职称评审论文学术不端现状及学术不端检测系统的应用价值。方法 使用中国知识资源总库科技期刊学术不端文献检测系统和万方数据论文相似性检测系统，对2012－2015年山东省部分高校职称论文进行检测，并使用Excel 2007对检测结果进行统计分析。结果 共计检测9565篇论文，其中中文论文7437篇，外文论文2128篇。每年均有90%以上的论文总复制比低于30%，2013－2015年均有94%以上的论文单篇最大文字复制比低于20%。结论 山东省高校论文文字复制比仍有下调的必要，小部分文献单篇复制比过高；学术不端文献检测系统存在检测盲区。
- Abstract:
- Objective To explore the current status of academic misconduct in the title evaluation papers submitted by some colleges and universities in Shandong Province and the application value of academic misconduct detection system. Methods Academic misconduct detection system of science and technology journals in Chinese Knowledge Resources and similarity detection system of Wanfang database were used to test the title evaluation papers submitted by some colleges and universities in Shandong Province from 2012 to 2015, and Excel 2007 was used to analyze the results. Results 9565 papers were tested, including 7437 Chinese papers and 2128 papers of foreign languages. More than 90% papers had a total copy ratio of less than 30% per year, and more than 94% papers had a single copy ratio of less than 20% in 2013－2015. Conclusion There is still a need to reduce the copy ratio of papers in colleges and universities in Shandong Province, and the single copy ratio of a small part of papers is too high. There are still blind spots in academic misconduct literature detection system.
参考文献/References:
[1] BARBASH F. Major publisher retracts 43 scientific papers amid wider fake peer-review scandal[EB/OL].(2015-03-27)[2017-02-24].https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/03/27/fabricated-peer-reviews-prompt-scientific-journal-to-retract-43-papers-systematic-scheme-may-affect-other-journals/?deferJs=true&outputType=default-article&utm_ term=.697eb8d86959.
[2] STIGBRAND T. Retraction Note to multiple articles in Tumor Biology[J]. Tumor Biology, 2017(4):5487-5492.[2017-02-14].https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6.
[3] 中国科学技术协会.中国科协发布《科技工作者科学道德规范》[EB/OL].(2007-03-23)[2017-03-01].http://www.cast.org.cn/ n35081/n35608/10395341.html.
[4] 中华人民共和国教育部.高等学校预防与处理学术不端行为办法[EB/OL].（2016-06-16）[2017-03-01].http://www.moe.edu.cn/ srcsite/A02/s5911/moe_621/201607/t20160718_272156.html.
[5] 中华人民共和国教育部.普通高等学校学生管理规定[EB/OL].（2017-02-04）[2017-03-01].http://www.moe.edu.cn/srcsite/ A02/s5911/moe_621/201702/t20170216_296385.html.
[6] 宋如华.从初审环节防范学术不端论文[N].科学时报,2009-12-11(A3).
[7] 杨晨晨.运用学术不端文献检测系统检测医学论文存在的问题及对策[J].编辑学报,2014,26(1):42-44.
[8] 王文福.期刊防范学术不端的深度反思——兼谈对AMLC系统的理性认知[J].编辑之友,2017(3):32-36,41.
[9] 李永莲.学术不端文献检测系统的检测盲区研究[J].青岛职业技术学院学报,2014,27(5):78-80,86.
[10] 朱燕.试论反抄袭软件的学术规范功能及其局限性[J].兰州教育学院学报,2016,32(10):91-93.
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2017-03-24
更新日期/Last Update:
2017-11-15