我国中医古籍孤本研究的文献计量分析

Title:

Bibliometric Analysis on Ancient Unique Copy of TCM in China

文章编号:

2095-5707(2020)06-0007-05

作者:

吴玉丰¹; 邵亭波¹; 郭华²; 柳春¹; 余磊¹; 殷世鹏^1*

1.甘肃中医药大学图书馆，甘肃 兰州 730000；2.甘肃中医药大学博物馆，甘肃 兰州 730000

Author(s):

WU Yu-feng¹;  SHAO Ting-bo¹;  GUO Hua²;  LIU Chun¹;  YU Lei¹;  YIN Shi-peng^1*

1. Library of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2. Museum of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China

关键词:

孤本; 抄本; 中医古籍; 文献计量学

Keywords:

unique copy;  transcript;  ancient books of TCM;  bibliometrics

分类号:

G353.1

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2020.06.002

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的 通过分析我国中医古籍孤本研究的现状，梳理研究内容，以期为该领域的研究提供参考。方法 以中国知识资源总库（CNKI）、中国学术期刊数据库（万方数据）、中文科技期刊数据库（维普网）为数据来源，检索建库至2019年12月31日公开发表的以中医古籍孤本为主题的学术论文，对发表年份、发文作者及机构、来源期刊、研究内容等进行分析。结果 本研究共筛选符合标准的文献353篇，其中学位论文12篇、会议论文18篇、期刊论文323篇。2005年以前发文量比较平缓，2006年开始明显增加；所有论文作者共计400位，其中第一作者256位，上海中医药大学段逸山以第一作者发文7篇和共计发文13篇位列第一；发文机构共有144家，上海中医药大学发文45篇居首位；载文期刊共有96种，《中医文献杂志》载文41篇排名第一。从研究内容分析，以中医古籍孤本工作为研究内容的文献29篇，研究主题包括中医古籍孤本资源调查、数字化保护、艺术美学价值欣赏、修复和编辑出版等；以具体的中医古籍孤本为研究内容的文献324篇，涉及古籍244部，涵盖版本考证、点校整理、价值评介及学术思想、遣方用药、临床应用等方面。结论 我国中医古籍孤本研究还有很大的研究空间，建议各古籍收藏机构构建自己的研究团队，多方筹集资金，在本馆古籍孤本资源的调查、考证、整理及有价值的中医古籍孤本内容挖掘方面开展广泛而深入的研究。

Abstract:

Objective To combing research contents by analyzing the status quo of ancient unique copy of TCM in China; To provide references for research in this field. Methods Using China National Knowledge Resources Database (CNKI), China Academic Journals Database (Wanfang Data), and Chinese Sci-tech Journals Database (Weipu.com) as data sources, articles about ancient unique copy of TCM from the establishment to December 31, 2019 were retrieved. The authors, institutions, journals, research contents, etc. were analyzed. Results This study screened a total of 353 articles that met the criteria, including 12 dissertations, 18 conference papers, and 323 journal papers. The number of publications was relatively stable before 2005, and it began to increase significantly in 2006; There were a total of 400 authors in all the papers, among which 256 were the first authors. Duan Yi-shan from Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ranked first with 7 first- author articles and 13 articles in total; There were 144 publishing organizations, and Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine published 45 papers, which ranked the first; there were a total of 96 journals with articles, and Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Literature published 41 articles, which ranked the first. From the perspective of study subject, 29 articles set ancient unique copy of TCM as the research subject. The research topics included resource investigation, digital protection, artistic aesthetic value appreciation, restoration, editing and publishing, etc. Totally 324 articles set specific ancient unique copy of TCM as the research subject, involving 244 ancient books, covering edition textual research, point collation, value evaluation and introduction, as well as the exploration of academic thoughts, prescription medication, clinical application and other contents. Conclusion There is still a lot of research space for the research on the ancient unique copy of TCM in China. It is recommended that all ancient book collection institutions build their own research teams to raise funds in various ways to investigate, textualize, organize and excavate the contents of valuable ancient TCM books, and conduct extensive and in-depth research.