OA视角下高校图书馆与公共图书馆联合科研项目管理服务探讨——基于江苏高校图书馆与公共图书馆调研

Title:

Discussion on Joint Provision of Research Project Management Services by Libraries of Colleges and Universities and Public Libraries from OA Perspective

文章编号:

2095-5707(2021)01-0031-05

作者:

周阳

中国药科大学图书与信息中心，江苏 南京 211198

Author(s):

ZHOU Yang

Library and Information Center of China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China

关键词:

高校图书馆; 公共图书馆; 科研项目管理; 开放存取

Keywords:

libraries of colleges and universities;  public libraries;  research project management;  OA

分类号:

G252；G258.6

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2021.01.006

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

文章提出了高校图书馆与公共图书馆联合科研项目管理并开放存取（OA）的服务策略，以使图书馆学术服务更上一层楼。采取网站调研与问卷调查相结合的方法，网站调研主要针对江苏高校图书馆与公共图书馆科研项目管理的现状，问卷调查主要围绕高校图书馆与公共图书馆联合科研项目管理并OA的阻滞因素。网站调研结果显示，高校图书馆在项目管理方面更具主导性，公共图书馆在联合管理方面更具优势，但都未推出完整的科研项目管理服务，更无法谈及项目内容与数据的OA。问卷调查结果显示，高校馆与公共馆对联合科研项目管理的价值与意义侧重不同，且在联合的模式上也有一定分歧，但是在联合管理的具体阻滞因素方面，高校馆与公共馆均认可的是政策支持、资源版权、共享政策、资金来源。建议以“独立构建再联合”的方式，在联合统一检索平台集成一个科研数据管理子平台，且在联合平台提供覆盖科研项目全周期的学术服务。

Abstract:

To put forward the service strategy of joint provision of research project management and open access (OA) between libraries of colleges and universities and public libraries; To improve academic services of libraries. The method of combining website survey with questionnaire survey is adopted. The website survey mainly included the status of research project management of libraries of colleges and universities and public libraries in Jiangsu Province, and the questionnaire survey mainly focused on the obstacles in the joint provision of research project management and OA of research project resources between libraries of colleges and universities and public libraries. In the website survey, libraries of colleges and universities were more dominant in “project management”, while public libraries had more advantages in “alliance”; however, neither of them had launched a complete “research project management” service, let alone the OA of project content and data. The questionnaire survey showed that libraries of colleges and universities and public libraries attached different levels of importance to the value and significance, and there were certain differences in the joint model; however, both libraries of colleges and universities and public libraries recognized that policy support, resource copyright, sharing policy and capital source were specific obstacles to joint management. It is recommended to integrate a scientific research data management sub-platform on the joint unified retrieval platform in the way of “independent construction and then joint”, and provide academic services covering the full cycle of scientific research projects on the joint platform.